The chart below shows the percentage of renewable energy in 4 countries between 1997 and 2010.
The column graph illustrates the differences and changes in the proportion of renewable energy provided by 4 different countries over a 13-year period from 1997 to 2010. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were upward trends in Iceland and Australia, while France bucked the trend. Noticeably, the most remarkable change could be found in France.
In particular, when it comes to Iceland, the percentage of renewable power stood at 65% in 1997 before increasing steadily to 75% in 2010, which accounted for the highest number. Besides, concerning Australia, the given graph witnessed a slight growth in the number from 17% in 1997 to 22% in 2010, which constantly constituted the lowest percentages.
In stark contrast, in terms of France, it demonstrates the opposite trend, the year 2010 underwent a significant decrease from 70% in 1997 to 40% in 2010 in the proportion of renewable energy. Meanwhile, regarding the UK, a slight rise of 10% in the first decade was experienced in this figure. Afterwards, the percentage of power fell back to a half in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-18 | maiphuong0610 | 89 | view |
- Some people argue that holding sporting events is beneficial to countries development However other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 87
- Many animals are endangered Some people argue that we should only protect animals that are useful to humans To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying 78
- Many people believe that zoos have no purpose in today s world and should be closed What problems do zoos bring What are the alternatives to zoos if they are closed 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, regarding, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05027932961 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88605752688 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625698324022 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5822434126 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239867862051 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950240794175 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819037511448 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155775014592 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168592438016 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.