The Table shows the percentage of pupils who entered higher education from five secondary schools between 1995 and 2000 inclusive.
The given table illustrated the continuing to pursue higher education of students from five secondary school at proportion through 1995 to 2000.
In general, there was a big difference trend between 5 academies. While Harble Secondary and Royston Academy’s rate of students entered higher education had an increasing trend, Greyston High’s figure was seen in opposite direction from 1995 to 2000. The percentage of students who took part in high school of Fairfield Girls and Cracked Boys which had slightly fluactuced, were unnoticeable changes of data in 5 years.
It's obvious that, there was a strongest uptrend of student entered higher education in Harble Secondary from 1995 to 2005, particularly at 80% in 2000. While Royston Academic's figure tended to increase the rate ones accounted for the lowest point at 60% than other schools in final year. Grey stone's figure reached a decreasing trend whilst the proportion of people who pursued higher education was still bigger than Royston's ones. Interestingly, Fairfield Girls's rate of pupils who continued higher education, which remained unchanged of ones with 75% in 1997 and 1998, had a up and down trend in 1999 and 2000. The percentage of students enrolled higher eduction of Cracked Boys can be seen a unnoticeable change by under 3% from 1995 to 2000
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 70
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 10
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 83
- Some people believe that having a conversation on a mobile phone in a public or crowded place should be banned Others feel that we should be able to talk wherever we like Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 29, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...5 years. Its obvious that, there was a strongest uptrend of student entered hi...
^
Line 4, column 576, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... of ones with 75% in 1997 and 1998, had a up and down trend in 1999 and 2000. The...
^
Line 4, column 694, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...er eduction of Cracked Boys can be seen a unnoticeable change by under 3% from 19...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, still, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20657276995 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73725428117 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572769953052 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.895263517 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.222222222 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384683695262 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158433477613 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105552935062 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298534472542 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610980652094 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.