The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009
The given tabular chart depicts the information about the count of attendence by four different secondary school in the year 2000 to 2009. The data is calebrated in percentum.
12% attendance was count in specialist schools during the year 2000 and after 9 years it was decreased by 2% as well as in the year 2005 the ratio of student attendence was 11%. It was observed that the percentage of regular attendance in community schools were 12. In during the year 2005 and 2009 community schools attendence had 32% and 58% respectively.
Moreover, it is predicted that the attandence of voluntary-controlled schools in 2000 about 50% and it was double than grammer schools. The attendence of students in grammer schools was 19% in the year 2005 but in the same year 38% of children were attended the class in voluntary controlled schools. 8% attendence of student waa maximum in voluntary controlled schools as compared to grammer schools in during the year 2009.
Conclusion, it is evident maximum students had attended communiy schools and less in specialist schools in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-15 | reverjae | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Siska Umila Adha | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Chyka | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | 70 | view |
- The bar charts below show the marriage and divorce statistics for nine countries in 1981 and 1994. 67
- The diagram below shows the process for making a water clock. 61
- Visual pollution is the major cause of accidents on road. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 11
- The bar charts below show the marriage and divorce statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994 67
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, second, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06145251397 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98880070996 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458100558659 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5127628115 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255978495196 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135235452603 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076459752258 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193247525083 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402565915573 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.