The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table reveals the percentage of attendance in four categories of secondary school settings from 2000 to 2009.
As an overview, it is interesting to note that during the given period, while community schools enjoyed a fourfold increase in attendance, the others witnessed falling figures at different levels.
To begin with, attendance rate in secondary community school was a mere 12 percent in the early 2000s. However, there had been a sudden increase in said rate, marking a staggering 58 percent in 2009; this was the all-time high figure ever recorded during the given years. Equally interesting is the fact that this was also the biggest and only growth among the four surveyed sector.
On the other hand, Specialist schools, Grammar schools, and Voluntary-controlled schools all suffered a drop in terms of rate of attendance. Secondary schools run by volunteers, despite the would-have-been highest figure of 52 percent, took a big hit in pupil’s attendance; this figure decreased to a much lesser 20 percent in 2009. Grammar schools and Specialist schools underwent a similar pattern; the figure for the former fell from 24 percent down to a minimal 12 percent, while that of the latter only had a negligible 2 percent drop from 12 to 10.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...e ever recorded during the given years. Equally interesting is the fact that this was a...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'would-have-been the highest'.
Suggestion: would-have-been the highest
... schools run by volunteers, despite the would-have-been highest figure of 52 percent, took a big hit in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11165048544 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96247384732 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587378640777 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5321569521 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.625 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122027509726 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667345499449 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675164564304 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101009499494 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780304316102 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.