The table illustrates the presents of children in four types of schools including specialists, grammar, voluntary controlled and community schools in 2000,2005and 2009. units are measured in percentage.
Overall, the percentage of attendance in community schools increased significantly over the given years. Whereas, the other three types of schools attendance declined dramatically and voluntary controlled schools were the highest in the given period.
In the beginning,the specialist school and community school attendance was 12% while over the years while in 2005 it reduced to 11% and 10% by 2009. In contrast to community school, it rose to 58% by 2009.
Regarding grammar school and voluntary controlled school attending pupils ratio also decreased between 2000 to 2009. In which voluntary controlled schools attendance was the highest among other types which is 52% in 2000 and dipped to 12% by 2009. Similarly, at the end of the period the proportion of attending pupils in grammar school was 12% in 2009 which was doubled at the beginning with 24%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Units
...community schools in 2000,2005and 2009. units are measured in percentage. Overall,...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...in the given period. In the beginning,the specialist school and community school ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 68, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pupils'' or 'pupil's'?
Suggestion: pupils'; pupil's
...d voluntary controlled school attending pupils ratio also decreased between 2000 to 2...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding pupils ratio also decreased between 2000 to 2009. In which voluntary control...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44578313253 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93385245058 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487951807229 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7966769219 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.444444444 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244455549682 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114399825348 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653532663615 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153504678136 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542285527164 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.