Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
These days some companies believe their employees should dress smartly to work. While others believe work quality weighs more than appearance. Personally, the quality of work seems to express my opinion clearly rather than the opposite idea.
To be said, work's quality above appearance does not mean dressing disrespectfully to the clients. Fundamentally, freely dressing shows the employees’ personalities. Firstly, many companies and organizations are tending to pay more attention to the worker’s efficiency and performances. Especially those international companies, where there is a friendly working environment that everyone feels free to express themselves through fashion, to share their thoughts encouragely. The company where my aunt works is an example. She is able to wear freely to work like loose pants, dresses, etc. Because skills and knowledge are highly required here so as to solve and deal with difficulties and demandings from work. One typical example in the art field are models or designers. Therefore, creativity and skills are critical demands. Additionally, the way they dress is more magnificent, inspiredly which makes them outstanding and expresses their characteristics.
On the other hand, some people think employees should dress smartly to work. It shows how polite and respectful you are to the customers because first impressions are always important in every communication or meeting with clients. As a result, it decides whether there may be any cooperation in the near future or not. Another persuasive reason worth considering is the chance to take good care of yourself. So, you will have a look at what is happening with your face, skin, and your body. Imagine that one day you wake up early, you have time for personal hygiene, feel energetic, delighted and dress smartly. Wouldn’t it be great?
To sum up, both ideas are worth considering and whether dressing smartly or not, those employees are contributing their efforts in working.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | eyraen | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-02 | tranvuongphuongmy | 61 | view |
- In many countries, people in big cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 56
- The diagram shows how a type of tent called a tepee is built Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 96
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 84
- Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- In many countries, people in big cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...employees should dress smartly to work. While others believe work quality weighs more...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... and knowledge are highly required here so as to solve and deal with difficulties and de...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, as to, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45954692557 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00322229659 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647249190939 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5813626243 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3333333333 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7142857143 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04761904762 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263166244099 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679712808766 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715931311206 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152275418246 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485360729234 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.