The table shows the salaries of secondary/high school teachers in 2009. Describe the main features of the figure.
The table gives information about junior and senior high school teachers’ incomes in five different countries in 2009.
Overall, while the educators’ salaries in Luxembourg were the highest starting and maximum salary, teachers from Australia had the lowest-paid. It is also noticeable that the teachers in Australia and Denmark only took less than 10 years to achieve the top salary whereas their counterparts in Luxembourg, Japan, Korea had to work for more than 30 years.
As can be seen from the table, secondary and high school teachers in Luxembourg were offered 8000 dollars at the beginning of their career, which is significantly higher than the remained four countries. Denmark took the second place at the first earned income of teachers with 45000, while the starting salary for a beginning teacher in Australia, Japan, and Korea stood at around 30,000 dollars.
After 15 years of career, Luxembourg topped the table with their teachers being paid 119,000 and it continued to grow up to 132,000 within 30 years. However, teachers with at least 15 years of experience in Denmark and Japan only made salaries of 54,000 and 65,000 respectively. Meanwhile, Australian and Korean teachers with the same level were paid the lowest pay rate, at 48,000 a year.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, whereas, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21359223301 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65274273521 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587378640777 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7551016867 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.25 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190324498766 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962269578809 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060717003658 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139268663093 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065073871181 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.