The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables provide data on coffee and banana sales in five countries in Europe in two separate years 1999 and 2004.
Overall, it can be seen that the sales of coffee increased most in the Uk. However, banana sales were highest in Switzerland in both years.
Looking at the first table in more detail, it is clear that the amount of coffee which was sold in the UK increased from 1.5M euros in 1999 to 20M euros in 2004, which was the largest increase in all countries. The sales of coffee experienced a two-fold increase to 6M euros in 2004 for Switzerland. On the other hand, there was a slight increase in coffee sales for Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden. Coffee sales in both Denmark and Belgium increased by just 0.2M euros.
Turning to the second table, it is evident that sales of banana grew from 15M euros in 1999 to 47M euros in 2004 in Switzerland. Similarly, Banana sales increased by 4.5M euros in the UK over the period whereas it increased by 3.4M euros for Belgium. In contrast, there was a slight downfall in banana sales in Sweden and Denmark. This figure decreased from 1.8M euros to 1M euros in Sweden and in Denmark, it shrank from 2M euros to 0.9M euros in the whole period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon 78
- Many people think that students should be allowed to choose the subjects that they study in school whereas others fell that they should study a set curriculum Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in two separate years 1999 and 2004. Overall, it can be seen that the sales o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, second, similarly, so, whereas, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54838709677 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32021128506 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.063105496 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223154644291 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124501506186 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953662271336 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19405328809 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111703536157 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.