The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.

The given tables compare the sales of two products with fairtrade labels in five nations between 1999 and 2004.
Overall, in most countries, the sales of bananas and coffee increased over the period except for Switzerland and Denmark of which banana sales experienced a decrease.
The greatest increase in coffee demand was seen in Britain. In 1999, the Uk imported 1.5 million euro value of coffee, which was half the figure for Switzerland. 5 years later, the sales of coffee in Britain saw a significant rise to 20 million euros while the figure for Switzerland doubled to 6 million. On the other hand, the figures for Denmark and Sweden slightly rose by 0.2 million and that for Belgium climbed by 0.7 to 1.7 million euros.
Looking at the second table, it seems that Switzerland had the highest consumption of bananas as its sales nearly trebled from 15 to 47 million. The figures for the UK and Belgium also followed a similar trend, rising from 1 and 0.6 to 5.5 and 4 million euros respectively. By contrast, the sales of bananas in Sweden and Denmark dropped by nearly half to 1 and 0.9 million in turn.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-01 trpg143 56 view
2023-11-16 phamquanghmu 73 view
2023-11-11 Daniel3003 67 view
2023-11-11 Daniel3003 67 view
2023-11-11 Daniel3003 67 view
Essays by user Bui Huyen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mark of which banana sales experienced a decrease. The greatest increase in cof...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, second, so, while, except for, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72222222222 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54078556084 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6573018927 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207805341054 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955573042502 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112985917482 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170707135807 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131141884503 0.0819641961636 160% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.