The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The tables compare the sale data of coffee and bananas in accordance with the Fairtrade facility in 1999 and 2004 of five nations.
Overall, it is apparent that coffee sale increased over the period. The same trend went with bananas sales, except for Sweden and Denmark. In both cases, UK and Switzerland are the two top countries in vending Fair trade coffee and bananas.
As seen from the former table, the UK was the country with the highest level of coffee trading, followed by Switzerland. Britain sales of coffee climbed tremendously after five years, from 1.5 million euros to 20 million euros. The figure for Switzerland was half of that of the UK in 1999 (3 million euros), but doubled in 2004. The remaining countries, including Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden had a quite similar movement in coffee trading, in compared to the UK in 1999. Those figures had only rose a few hundred thousand euros in the equivalent time span.
Regarding the latter one, Switzerland was on top of bananas consumption with 15 million euro spent. The number trebled to 47 in the next five years. While UK and Belgium’s figures adopt the compatible trend, rising slightly about 4 million. In contrast, the sales of bananas in Denmark dropped more than a half in 2004 (0.9 million euro), and Sweden declined nearly 1 million of euro.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
... the UK in 1999. Those figures had only rose a few hundred thousand euros in the equ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90178571429 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80823088693 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6270598846 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4615384615 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2307692308 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165964604932 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660291345929 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617751695689 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134102664087 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765730084134 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.