The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graphs compare the statistics of coffee and banana Fairtrade sales in 1999 and 2004 among five different European countries. Overall, it is obvious that Fairtrade-labeled coffee sales increased in all five countries while banana sales witnessed the rise in only three countries. In addition, in the UK and Switzerland, the sales of coffee and bananas both had significant growth.
It is clear in the tables that Fairtrade-labeled coffee sales climbed up in all five countries. The UK market witnessed the most significant change when the coffee sales rocketed to 20 millions of euros in 2004, compared to only 1.9 millions of euros in 1999. The rise in the Sweden market is the least significant when it only soared from 0.8 millions of euros in 1999 to 1 millions in 2004.
On the other hand, the banana sales among the five European countries share a more fluctuating trend. Three countries which are Switzerland, the UK and Belgium showed the increase in sales, with Switzerland having the most drastic jump from 15 millions of euros in 1999 to 47 millions in 2004. All the while, Sweden and Denmark had their numbers sunk with Denmark showing a more dramatical plunge from 2 millions of euros in 1999 to 0.8 millions in 2004.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair trade coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 61
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair trade coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 81
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04205607477 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04406525952 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481308411215 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.5046041084 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.142857143 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5714285714 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239035287332 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151218421252 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136528826473 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209825234012 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129728541912 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.