The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams compare the transaction amount of coffee and bananas earmarked for Fairtrade in five different European nations. The data in two specific years, 1999 and 2004 are reported, and the units are measured in millions of euros. Overall, most countries witnessed a growth in sales of Fairtrade-recognised coffee and bananas except Sweden and Denmark, both of which showed a decline in sales of bananas.
In terms of sales of coffee, Switzerland came in first with 3 millions of euros in 1999, followed by Denmark (1.8 million). In contrast, sale in Sweden was 0.2 million lower than 1 million euros, which ranked the last among all regions. After five years, sale in the UK skyrocketed to 20 millions of euros, nearly 13 times higher than the original value, surpassing that in Switzerland. The other countries also saw an upward trend, but less significantly. Among them, Sweden continued showing the least transaction amount of coffee though its sale had risen to 1 million euros in 2004.
As for transactions of bananas, Switzerland was predominant across the time given. Fifteen millions of euros were recorded in 1999, and the figure tripled over in 2004. The UK and Sweden both witnessed an increase of 4.5 and 3.4 million respectively. Finally, sales in Denmark and Sweden almost halved, none of which exceeded 1 million euros in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Pham Mai Nguyet | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | el-naz | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | Sri Wahyuningsih | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Sonya Hsieh | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Tran Mai Phuong | 84 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- In some countries, children under 16 are not allowed to leave school by law and get full-time work. Is this a good or bad thing? 84
- With the development of tourism, more and more cheap and discount fights are made available to holidaymakers. Some environmental groups claim that governments should tax air traffic more because its growth has a tremendous impact on the environment. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
... coffee, Switzerland came in first with 3 millions of euros in 1999, followed by Denmark 1.8 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...ve years, sale in the UK skyrocketed to 20 millions of euros, nearly 13 times higher than the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 84, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: 'Fifteen million'.
Suggestion: Fifteen million
... was predominant across the time given. Fifteen millions of euros were recorded in 1999, and the fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, so, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08520179372 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83063024329 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569506726457 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2160296565 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133638410825 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557211806294 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461541128119 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110342817735 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061936205007 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.