The tables show results of 2 surveys done in 1980 and 2010 on various aspects of city living in a particular city. Units are measured in percentage.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two tables compare percentage according to the results of two surveys which people assessed different aspects of one city's life as good, average or bad in the years of 1980 and 2010.
Overall, in 1980, three aspects, education, healthcare, environment, were given the highest score, other aspects, shops, employment, transport were the least, whereas, after three decades, education, employment increased sharply, healthcare and transport decreased dramatically and environment and shops were almost constant.
To begin with 1980, people rated education, healthcare and environment the highest proportion 72%, 82%, 72% approvals, respectively, although under a tenth of surveyed people assessed them as bad. For shops and employment, just under two thirds of participants on survey said that these services were good, however under 10% people thought that they were bad. Over half of participated people on survey rated transport and a third of them said transport system was bad.
Turning to 2010, the most significant increase was in education and employment with both of them increasing to 82% and to 72%, respectively, even though opponents of them had increase to 9%, 23%, as well. Healthcare had experienced a decrease to 74% by 2010. The transport facilities went down from 52% to 39%, the figure was 38% who were not satisfied with transport service.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-26 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-02 | tvaishnavi | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 82
- It is thought by some that its is better to live in a city while others believe that life is better in the countryside Discuss both sides and give your opinion 67
- The diagrams below show the cycle of a lady bird and its anatomy 91
- The tables show results of 2 surveys done in 1980 and 2010 on various aspects of city living in a particular city Units are measured in percentage Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, third, well, whereas, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44131455399 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8781448812 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586854460094 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.1478824394 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.875 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0901448346546 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460598989114 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647288299197 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729270999904 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820402046794 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.