Task 1: the table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004.
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Nigeria 205,000 210,000 190,000 210,000 213,000
Chad 0 0 0 8,000 50,000
Congo 275,000 234,000 222,000 215,000 203,000
Somalia 5,000 8,000 17,000 21,000 50,000
They illustrate daily oil goods in four countries over a period of four years starting in 2004.
Overall, it is obvious that the number of oil products in the three countries increased considerably between 2000 and 2004, while there was a slight increase in the figure for oil goods in Congo.
To begin with, staring at around 205.000, Nigeria was dominant, with its figure dropping marginally to 190.000 per barrel day, followed by an upward trend in the next year. Although the Congo experienced a substantial marginal to 222.000, there were oil goods decreased to nearly 203.000 barrels per day over a two-year period.
Regarding Chad, it stayed stable between 2000 and 2004, remaining stable from 0 to 0 per barrel day, and was predicted to grow to about 50,000 per barrel day two during the period. Even though the figure for Somalia underwent a moderate upward trend until 2002, they climbed substantially by 50,000 per barrel day in the next two years.
- some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents 56
- Task 1 the table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Nigeria 205 000 210 000 190 000 210 000 213 000 Chad 0 0 0 8 000 50 000 Congo 275 000 234 000 222 000 215 000 203 000 Somalia 5 000 8 000 17 000 21 89
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 78
- Some people believe that shops should not be allowed to sell fast food that has been scientifically proven to be bad for people s health 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Chad, it stayed stable between 2000 and 2004, remaining stable from 0 to 0 per b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92024539877 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4969852725 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60736196319 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.8468557667 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.666666667 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31775106763 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170555611987 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992720654881 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167767966283 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127122131238 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.