Some people believe that shops should not be allowed to sell fast food that has been scientifically proven to be bad for people’s health.
Some people argue that selling junk food has been scientifically proven to affect a person's health. In my opinion, selling junk food has both positive and negative effects which will be discussed in this essay.
on the other hand, this phenomenon creates two disadvantages to begin with a few groups use fast food daily because it helps person boost their energy and the poor have enough money for fast food. For example, now, people focus on their job and have little time for cooking, while employees can earn little income. Moreover, fast food is affordable, so the poor can buy it. As a result, junk food is good for money and convenient. In addition, any person enjoys fast food because it eases eating and saves time. As a result, junk food is very delicious and not a waste of time.
On the one hand, this tendency comes with two advantages for junk food. Firstly many people are really into banning fast food because they think junk food would possibly cause weight and pose a health risk. For example, the food needs to be fried in a lot of oil while many shops save money that never changing the oil to boost profit the buyer doesn't know toxic food, usually, they have eaten Junk food. As a result, fast food brings harmful substances to health. Secondly, there is an individual who saves money, This could be because everybody would posily cook food and they understand each ingredient of the food. For this reason, everyone doesn’t have a loss of fee and has good health.
In conclusion, although selling junk food has many disadvantages, there are a number of positive effects that should be taken into account.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-04 | húc tinh | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | thaohienpt008 | 73 | view |
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents 56
- Some people believe that shops should not be allowed to sell fast food that has been scientifically proven to be bad for people s health 61
- some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents 56
- some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... been scientifically proven to affect a persons health. In my opinion, selling junk foo...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...which will be discussed in this essay. on the other hand, this phenomenon creates...
^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...nging the oil to boost profit the buyer doesnt know toxic food, usually, they have eat...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73333333333 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3291057864 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3184148645 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9333333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342213521414 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125043399091 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802406191202 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227992971627 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719701447349 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.