The three pictures below show three different kinds of bridges. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The triple of pictures compare the structure patterns of variation of bridges are being changed.
In summary, according to the topographical features are appropriated type of maritime transports as well as the number of piers is allowed built
Begin with Arch bridge, the bridge is formed of curve crossing the lake that is not piers constructed, many of the bricks stacked instead, by making this, the Arch bridge is fixed. Otherwise, the Concrete Girder Bridge has a significant altered number of pillars based on the desire extended of the bridge. At that time, the suspension bridge are erected by two big piers which rooted into underwater cliffs.
Concerning the technical requirements, these bridges are planned to noticeable differences. Starting with the Arch bridge, a limit of length of 200m, in which, with a position of 200m maximum conceived of the architectural of Concrete bridge, and yet the suspension bridge has the longest width up to 2000m. In specially, the sizes of clearance counted from the water surface of Arch and Concrete Bridge are 100m, 300m, respectively, so that small-sized ships and middle-sized ships are be guaranteed sailed. Regardless, the water level underneath the suspension bridge is a depth level for large-sized ships navigated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... topographical features are appropriated type of maritime transports as well as t...
^^
Line 4, column 488, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...-sized ships and middle-sized ships are be guaranteed sailed. Regardless, the wate...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, in summary, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30049261084 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93875292875 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591133004926 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.901279675 43.030603864 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0918810522294 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425969664819 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0226321741328 0.0843802449381 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0594314684379 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213483276352 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.