The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

Essay topics:

The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

The three pie graphs illustrate the trends of spending proportion in British school over thirty years.
it can be clearly seen that there was an increase in insurance. Overall, the percentage of each part changed softly.
As for teachers’ salaries, which were the highest spending over three pies, it got 40% in the year 1981 and raised to 45% slightly at 2001, while the highest proportion was 50% of total school spending in 1991. On the resources such as books, which were spent 15% at the beginning, rose by 5% to 20% lightly at 1991 and finally fell to 9% dramatically after a decade.
In 1981, the proportion of furniture and equipment was 15% as well as higher than 5% at 1991, and 23% was recorded at 2001. Other workers’ salaries could not be ignored at 1981, it was the second-high proportion at 28%, while there was a decrease after two decades by 13% to 15%. finally, insurance was the lowest over the three graphs, it was 2%, 3% and 8% separately in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-28 Sandhu param 73 view
2020-01-25 Noah1997 33 view
2020-01-22 pateldhruv1708 67 view
2020-01-10 Ali Elameen 73 view
2020-01-10 Ali Elameen 67 view
Essays by user cocococo123 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...n in British school over thirty years. it can be clearly seen that there was an i...
^^
Line 4, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...crease after two decades by 13% to 15%. finally, insurance was the lowest over the thre...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, second, so, well, while, as for, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64406779661 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63668145947 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598870056497 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1558508551 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202997523835 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096007489141 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737499059246 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124946577818 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558216709156 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.