The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The three pie charts illustrate the information about how a school spent their budget in the UK in three years. Three charts show budget caparison between 1981 to 2001 with a decade difference.
In all three years, a large amount of their budget spends on teachers salaries and the least amount was spent on insurance. in 1991, on furniture and equipment has much less amount of money spent although in other years this amount considerable.
In 1981, 40% amount spent on salaries which are the least amount of money compared with the other two years 50% and 45% in 1991and 2001 respectively.
The second segment of money taken by other salaries which more than 20% of the budget. overall the around 70% of money spent on salaries. In 1981and 1991 budget spent on the resources and book 15% and 20% respectively but 2001, it decreased to 9%. on furniture is less money spend 5% in 1991 than other years. In 2001 the insurance budget increases to 8% although in the other two years it is less than 4%.
- Topic More and more people choose to work at home and students study from home as the development of computer technology makes it more convenient and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 73
- Many think that in today s world it is very difficult for people to maintain a healthy lifestyle Others however feel that it is easy for people to be healthy and fit if they want to be Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The Diagram Below Shows How Geothermal Energy Is Used to Produce Electricity 56
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...he least amount was spent on insurance. in 1991, on furniture and equipment has mu...
^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e other two years 50% and 45% in 1991and 2001 respectively. The second segment o...
^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...ries which more than 20% of the budget. overall the around 70% of money spent on salari...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 248, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...pectively but 2001, it decreased to 9%. on furniture is less money spend 5% in 199...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63483146067 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42259932749 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505617977528 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7255983402 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202926408593 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920122255608 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883426483181 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139677847127 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11995041461 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.52 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.