The three pie charts below show the chnges in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.
The given three circular charts reveal the information about the changes in annual spending by a UK school in three years:1980,1991,2001. The data is calibrated in percentum which is clearly and coherently representation.
It is crystal clear from the charts, the resources e.g. books, or furniture and equiment was equal(15%) in year 1981. In addition to this, the insurance had been decreased in year 1981. Moreover, the chnges in school spending during the year 1991; other workers salaries, teacher salaries, and resources e.g. books was 22%,50% and 20% respectively.
As far as trend was concerned that, the teachers salaries had increased in year 1991. After that, the resources e.g. books had been decreased during the year 2001. However, the chnges in school spending in year 2001; other workers salaries, furniture and equipment and insurance was 15%,23% and 8% respectively.
Overall , it is evident that the other workers salaries had decreased year by year and the teachers salaries in maximum portion in given three charts
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | Miss Zune | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-29 | Jonkun | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | dilipkarki | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-12 | trangh16688 | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Manpreetgill | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the results of suvey conducted by a personal department at a major company? 11
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990. 73
- The daigrams show the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the cancrete for building purposes? 78
- The table below gives information about favorite pastime in different countries in percentage. 11
- The following graph and pie chart shows the sales of a company in the first and the second quarter of the year.(percentage) 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...as 15%,23% and 8% respectively. Overall , it is evident that the other workers sa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., however, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31707317073 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96117515699 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1991264057 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8888888889 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238559078367 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102490106554 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111581300715 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159847694546 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944447105004 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.