The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare how a specific school in the UK spent money, in percentage terms in three separate years 1981, 1991 and 2001, across five categories.
In general, there were many changes in spending in all five categories, with spending on teachers' salaries being the largest portion.
It can be seen from the charts that the majority of spending each year was on salaries. Teachers' salaries accounted for 40% of spending in 1981. This increased to 50% in 1991 but then dropped to 45% in 2001. On the other hand, salaries for other workers demonstrated a constant fall. It accounted for 28% of spending in 1981, this decreased to 22% in 1991 and continued to decline sharply to 15% in 2001.
Besides, spending on resources such as books and on furniture and equipment took up 15% each in 1981. By 1991, spending on resources had risen to 20% whilst spending on furniture and equipment had fallen dramatically to 5%. In contrast, by 2001, spending on resources had more than halved to 9% whereas spending on furniture and equipment had risen steeply to 23%.
Finally, spending on insurance rose from 2% in 1981 to 3% in 1991 and thereafter reached 8% of the total in 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-29 | Jonkun | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-12 | trangh16688 | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-18 | goodluck0101 | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-18 | goodluck0101 | 73 | view |
| 2018-04-17 | mostafa abdulaziz | 73 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh 70
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- The flowchart below the recycling process of aluminium cans 66
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in weathy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, if, so, then, whereas, in contrast, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7427184466 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62265789478 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54854368932 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0975537822 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8181818182 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231674528691 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937834878306 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540207219291 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137131457331 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498705677771 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.