Traffic growth in the Natherland since 1950.
The given line graph depicts the information about the traffic growth in the Natherland from 1950 to 2000. The data is calibrated in percentum which is clearly and coherently represented.
Overall, it is evident that the in year 1950 the car was commonly used by the people and it shows the dramatic growth till 2000 as compared to other transports.
It can be seen that the car was used in the year was 0%. In the year 1950 and 1960 the car showed the dramatic growth and reached upto 60% and 100% respectively. Finally, in the year 2000 the car growth was goes up and touch the peak point was 140%.
Apart from that, in the year 1950 the train, car and other public transport was on same proportion was 0%. After 1 decade, the percentum of tarin and bus was same was 3% but, other public transport shows no growth. In the year 1980, the value of train, bus and other public was 15%,12% and 10% respectively. Finally, in the year 2000 the difference between t these transports was 5%.
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for laerning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion on this? 56
- Some people says that computer games are bad for childern by all mean while others believe that these games are contributing to children development. 61
- The daigram shows the life cycle of the silkworm and stages in the production of the silk cloth 73
- The following graph and pie chart shows the sales of a company in the first and second qua of the year 84
- Traffic growth in the Natherland since 1950 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49723756906 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40210168145 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491712707182 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1879743394 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16856883705 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828223806535 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10807930013 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139490440495 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087006647582 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.