The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the US and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system.
According to the two figures, the first figure represents the proportion of committed offenders in the UK by different age groups and sexes, and the second pie chart displays a comparison regarding the percentage of convicted criminal in different sexes.
It is obvious that the number of male committed offenders is always higher than female in all the age group, especially in adolescence, the amount of criminality hits the high point in both sexes, while the male criminal is the triple of female. That could be expected, there are a significant discrepancies showed as the pie chart in two sexes of the people in the jail.
The conviction rates of both genders illustrate a similar trend from all the age group. At the age of 10, the female and male offenders are 0% and 2% respectively. From then on, the conviction rate of youth boy soars to 16% at the age of 20, which is the highest percentage of all the age. In the meantime, a steady increase is showed on the conviction rate in youth girl reaches 5% at the age of 20. Afterwards, the number of criminality starts tuning down in male and female, gradual declines to the 2% and 0%. During all the age group, the percentage of male prisoner is remarkable large than female. Therefore, it shows a proportion that men outnumber women 24 to 1.
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 84
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years. 67
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six countries, in millions of barrels per day, from 1990 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 11
- The graph beside shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'discrepancy'?
Suggestion: discrepancy
...ld be expected, there are a significant discrepancies showed as the pie chart in two sexes of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69565217391 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77313605037 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508695652174 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2199335653 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334109822191 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129359176637 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409591881805 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207470236555 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567834820674 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.