The two graphs below show the percentage of smokers and the consumption of alcohol in litres in selected countries, for the period 1960-2000.
The first line graph compares the proportion of population who smoke everyday in terms of percentage and the second one reveals information regarding the consumption of alcohol per capita in terms of litres in some countries between 1960 and 2000.
Overall, smokers population in all three countries(USA, Japan, and Holland) experienced a dramatic decline over the 40-year period. However, a significant rise in alcohol consumption could be seen in Holland throughout the same period.
In 1960, Holland had the highest number of smokers with around 60% of the population, followed by Japan with 49%, and the USA with 40%. Interestingly, by 2000, all countries had shown a remarkable drop in the number of smokers, making the USA the country with the lowest number of smokers, at approximately 20% of the population.
Turning to alcohol consumption, in 1960, an average American drank about 8 litres of alcohol, and that was four times higher than that consumed by Hollanders, and eight times by Turks. However, starting from 1976, Holland overtook the USA in the amounts of alcohol consumed per person, becoming the most alcohol drunk country, whereas Turks maintained their limit at around 1.8 litres over the whole period, remaining the lowest of all.
- The two graphs below show the percentage of smokers and the consumption of alcohol in litres in selected countries for the period 1960 2000 78
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25247524752 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78985323106 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589108910891 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.7503678203 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.571428571 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271521193917 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114345032857 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574077168574 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152918441446 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564316617732 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25247524752 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78985323106 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589108910891 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.7503678203 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.571428571 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271521193917 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114345032857 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574077168574 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152918441446 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564316617732 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.