The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The given maps indicates the change in the road access of a city hospital within 3 years from 2007.

By thoroughly analysing the maps, it clearly shows that there are some significant changes occured around the hospital in a span of just 3 years. In the older map of the city hospital of 2007; either side of the hospital road were used as bus stop and there where only one parking area near to the east end of bus stop, which were used by both hospital staffs as well as public.

When it comes to 2010 map, one major change that we can observe is the establishment of two roundabouts connecting city road and hospital road and also to the entrance of the hospital. The older bus stops has been completely removed and a new bus station was built at the west side. The older bus stop on the east side is converted as the staff car parking area. Now there is a new public car park at the east end near to the hospital.

However, there is no change at the ring road on the northern side of the city hospital. All the developments happend at the front area and at the east side of hospital.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...which were used by both hospital staffs as well as public. When it comes to 2010 map, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t end near to the hospital. However, there is no change at the ring road on t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.29468599034 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27292504109 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507246376812 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5380520535 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7777777778 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188559734614 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827545522425 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903135028193 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138793987651 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757724363587 0.0819641961636 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.9 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.