The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The two given maps illustrate road entrance to a city hospital in the years 2007 and 2010.
In general, in the first map there was hospital street connecting city hospital to other parts of the city. Another important trent, the public car park was located in the right-hand side in the second map.
Beginning with the first map, it can be observed that a city hospital was surronded by ring road. In addition the city hospital is connected with city road by hospital road. Moreover, the car park located in the right and left sides of hospital road for public and staff who working in the city hospital. The bus stoped in the east of city hospital.
Moving on the second map, it can be seen that two roundabout in the south of city hospital which were not exist in the first map. The structure in the south of city hospital updated by separate the parking of staff and public compared with first map and adding both bus station and staff car park in the left and right sides respectively. Whereas the public car park was in the east of city hospital. Last issue, there was roundabout in the right of staff car park near the city road.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...hospital was surronded by ring road. In addition the city hospital is connected with cit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by hospital road. Moreover, the car park located in the right and left sides of h...
^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing in the city hospital. The bus stoped in the east of city hospital. Moving on...
^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...e south of city hospital which were not exist in the first map. The structure in the ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f and public compared with first map and adding both bus station and staff car pa...
^^
Line 4, column 340, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the left and right sides respectively. Whereas the public car park was in the east of...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...espectively. Whereas the public car park was in the east of city hospital. Last i...
^^
Line 4, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of staff car park near the city road.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, so, whereas, in addition, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48557692308 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23544251043 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.418269230769 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.742223505 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8181818182 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228739445824 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123265473885 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841522509351 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193986969462 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799333984098 0.0819641961636 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.