The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The 2 maps illustrate ways which are used by automobiles near a medical facility of city and how it has changed between 2007 and 2010.
As seen from these two maps, overall appearance of road changed significantly. Locations of Bus station, staff car park, public car park are all moved in 2010 from which were located in 2007. There are also changes in intersections which are replaced by roundabout. I think these changes perhaps had related to safety of traffic.
Moreover, Bus station was replaced into 6 peaces of bus stops which located left and right sides of road which lead to the hospital. Similarly, car parking for staff and public separated into 2 areas. In 2010, Public car park situated east side of the hospital while staff car park situated south east side of the hospital.
To sum up, changes which had been done during the given period on road around hospital brought significant development in the region.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- In spite of the advance made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports center now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports center now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports center now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 778.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65868263473 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2938587144 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443113772455 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.0599302268 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.7272727273 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1818181818 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248982090277 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131798148964 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645886732037 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22168818921 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441220799808 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 5.99 8.06136585366 74% => OK
difficult_words: 17.0 40.7170731707 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.