The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The map illustrates how road access to a city hospital have developed over two different time periods (2007 and 2010).

Overall, the area around the hospital has been reconstructed for smoother traffic flow. Furthermore, there has been significant changes for bus station and parking spaces.

In 2007, The parking space was common for both public and staff parking whereas it has been divided into 2 separate places in 2010, one is on the hospital road and another to the left of hospital. The old common parking has been reserved for staff only and the new space is meant for public.

The Bus stop has also been upgraded to a new bus station by bifurcating the hospital road and joining the station at two new roundabouts’, which are created at the junction of hospital and intersection of City road. Old bus stops have been removed completely from the hospital road and the station is present to the left of the road.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-26 panosstef 11 view
2020-01-26 panosstef 73 view
2020-01-26 panosstef 73 view
2020-01-22 dolzoo 67 view
2020-01-16 Loi Chau 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and the new space is meant for public. The Bus stop has also been upgraded to a...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.825 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65988721565 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5375 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9533600262 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177767034525 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924153373456 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931466679235 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128138261751 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10196112458 0.0819641961636 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.