The Two Pie Charts Below Show Some Employment patterns in Great Britain 1992
The pie charts given below illustrate some employment pattern in Great Britain in 1992. The data are measured in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that both of female and male were similar biggest percentage of a categories which was managerial and professional, whilst the smallest percentage was general labourers.
Looking at the first pie charts was female the hugest percentage was clerical or related which had 31%. Difference from managerial and professional as the second biggest percentage was 29%. Followed by other manual, it got 27% while other non-manual, craft or similar, and general labourers had the total 13% which were the smallest percentages of all employment patterns.
However, male showed some patterns which was dominated by managerial and professional it got 36%. Other manual as the second biggest percentages was 26%. Followed by craft or similar as the third biggest it got 24% while other clerical or related. Other non manual, and general labourers had the total 8% which were the smallest percentages of all employment patterns.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-13 | Sandeep USA | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Sakib | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | mocmoc2610 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | fdsugb22 | view |
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main export in 2000 20 and future projection for 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The Pie Charts Below Show The Comparison of Different Kinds of Energy Production of France in Two Years 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a category' or simply 'categories'?
Suggestion: a category; categories
...male were similar biggest percentage of a categories which was managerial and professional, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32544378698 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83462216269 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502958579882 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0052124769 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177837839807 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099952077142 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.20376495612 0.0843802449381 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14874358903 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106371382158 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a category' or simply 'categories'?
Suggestion: a category; categories
...male were similar biggest percentage of a categories which was managerial and professional, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32544378698 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83462216269 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502958579882 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0052124769 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177837839807 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099952077142 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.20376495612 0.0843802449381 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14874358903 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106371382158 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.