The Charts Below Show US Spending Patterns between 1966 and 1996.
The pie charts given below compare US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996. The data is measured in percentage. In overall, it can be seen that the greatest change was cars while the significant decrease was food.
In 1966, the hugest percentage was food which had 44%. Difference from cars as the second biggest percentage was 23%. Followed by furniture it got one in ten. This was also the case for petrol which very low levels of spending patterns throughout the period at 9%. Meanwhile restaurants, books, and computers had total 14% which were the smallest percentages of all energy production of France.
By 1996, the most popular spending pattern in US was cars. However this pattern of spent increased dramatically over thirty years to represent the largest proportion of US spending pattern at more than two fifths. Although both of food and restaurants were similar biggest percentages but food fell significantly to only 14%. Initially, computers figure was fairly low but it went up slightly to one in ten.
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main export in 2000 20 and future projection for 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 84
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 78
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The Charts Below Show US Spending Patterns between 1966 and 1996 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...g patterns throughout the period at 9%. Meanwhile restaurants, books, and computers had t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...opular spending pattern in US was cars. However this pattern of spent increased dramati...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70293957627 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658823529412 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1496799416 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.6666666667 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1666666667 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277517311339 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109848081755 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.194632654744 0.0843802449381 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209567791114 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119997208563 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.