The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.

Essay topics:

The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.

The given cyclic charts picturise the information about five main sources of energy provided by USA in the 1980s and 1990s. The data is calibrated in percentum.

It can be seen that for the year 1980, oil was covering 42% of the whole pie chart , which makes it most consumed source of energy in the USA. In addition to this, natural gas , coal and hydroelectric power were noticed to be 26% , 22% and 5% respectively. Moreover , nuclear energy had a small fraction from rest of the sources of energy.

As far as trend was concerned , in the late 1990s. Oil was pinpointed at 33% of the total but on the other side natural gas contributed a quarter in the formation of circular chart . Apart from all this, 27% was contributed towards the consumption of coal . Moreover , hydroelectric power and nuclear power had been noticed to be at 5% and 10% respectively.

Overall, it is evident that while collating both of the pie charts there was an uplift in coal and nuclear power. Hydroelectric power remained static for both the years . However, there was a drop for resources of oil and natural gas.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-22 Spring2019 61 view
2019-11-27 tiendung00001 56 view
2019-10-12 Lia Bui 84 view
2019-10-05 Kamal1993 67 view
2019-09-20 green1222 78 view
Essays by user Gurleenjohal :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... was covering 42% of the whole pie chart , which makes it most consumed source of ...
^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he USA. In addition to this, natural gas , coal and hydroelectric power were notic...
^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...droelectric power were noticed to be 26% , 22% and 5% respectively. Moreover , nuc...
^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 26% , 22% and 5% respectively. Moreover , nuclear energy had a small fraction fro...
^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...energy. As far as trend was concerned , in the late 1990s. Oil was pinpointed a...
^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...arter in the formation of circular chart . Apart from all this, 27% was contribute...
^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tributed towards the consumption of coal . Moreover , hydroelectric power and nucl...
^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...wards the consumption of coal . Moreover , hydroelectric power and nuclear power h...
^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...power remained static for both the years . However, there was a drop for resources...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, while, apart from, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71354166667 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70947484383 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567708333333 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3337499974 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.4166666667 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231862893512 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808041613782 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122824734352 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16873570351 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133635857212 0.0819641961636 163% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.