Two tunnels (diagrams) The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese islands.
The two figures illustrate the differences between the two tunnels. Figure 1 indicates how the cross-section of the Mont-Blanc Road Tunnel between France and Italy was constructed from 1957 and 1965 while Figure 2 shows a Railway Tunnel named Seikan in Japan which is built during a 42-year period (1946-1988).
It is clear that the Railway Tunnel needed more time to complete than the Road Tunnel. Noticeably, Japan’s tunnel is longer than Road Tunnel.
Looking at the first figure, the Mon-Blanc was constructed to connect French and Italy whereas the Railway Tunnel was located in the domestic area of Japan, which helped the Japanese to transport from Aomori City to Hakodate city. Whereas the length of the Road Tunnel was 11.60 km, the length of the Railway Tunnel was approximately five times longer, at 53.85 km.
Moving to the remaining parts, the Railway Tunnel of Japan took 42 years to construct, which was slower than the Road Tunnel, at only 8 years. Meanwhile, the height of the Seikan Tunnel compared to Tsugaru Strait was around 240m. By contrast, the gap between the cross-section of Mont-Blanc and land was 3.5 km.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-28 | Huy Vu | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-27 | Huy Vu | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-22 | chau111 | view | |
| 2019-01-17 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 74 | view |
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas while others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own styles Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Whether or not someone achieve their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The charts below show the proportion of people s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1958 and in 2008 78
- The graph below shows information about the total oil consumption of four major consumers from 2009 to 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some educationalists say that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02631578947 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56348209341 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7405076697 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223782340974 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112225498284 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525063076429 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151396661152 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580172395077 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.