The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese Islands.
The diagrams present the cross-sections of two tunnels. Figure 1 describes a road tunnel linking 2 European countries, while Figure 2 illustrates a railway tunnel connecting two islands in Japan.
In general, it can be seen clearly that Japan’s railway tunnel is much longer than the one placed in Mont-Blanc mountain. Also, the Seikan railway tunnel was constructed longer than the Mont-Blanc road tunnel.
It can be seen that there are no similarities between the depth of the two tunnels. The depth of the Mont-Blanc tunnel is 3.5 km at its maximum compared with 240m used to build the Seikan tunnel. Therefore, while the Mont-Blanc tunnel is deeper than the Seikan railway tunnel, the length of roadway connecting Italy and France is only 11,6 km; the Seikan is much longer, at 53,85 km.
Another noticeable feature is that the construction times used to build two tunnels were significantly different. It took 42 years to complete the construction of the Seikan railway tunnel in Japan, between 1946 and 1988; while it took only 8 years, between 1957 and 1965.
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Some people are born to be leaders others believe leadership can be learned Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Nowadays most people learn academic study in university but others think we should encourage to learn vocational skills more do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that it is effective for students to study in a group at school while others think it is better to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 41.998997996 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 1615.20841683 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 178.0 315.596192385 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02808988764 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74879895959 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 176.041082164 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539325842697 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 506.74238477 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0817833383 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20512936362 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108464123391 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082175257007 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140634809713 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836613310741 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.