Unemployment rates us and japan
The polylinear graph represent the jobless estimate in united states and japan between march 1993 to march 1995. The data is calibrated in percentage
Overall, after observing the graph,the out of work value continued increased whereas,in united states follwed by downward trend
To embark with, in 1993 the unpaid worker in japan was start from from 2.5% and continued increased but in 1995 out of work in japan follwed minor downward trend while, united states of America start from 7.0 percent and flactulate between over the year and decreased rapidly from 1993 to 1996.
Apart from that, in mid of 1996s in japan jobless fall and after that increased slowly year by year and follwed similar trend untill 1997 after that, unpaid rate in japan immediately rise and followed same trend. Whereas, united states instantly decreased but just end over the 5.0 percent
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | tr_h.20 | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-30 | tr_h.20 | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-10 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-23 | lethianhthu | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-22 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ge Overall, after observing the graph,the out of work value continued increased w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...f work value continued increased whereas,in united states follwed by downward trend...
^^^
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: from
...93 the unpaid worker in japan was start from from 2.5% and continued increased but in 199...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...states of America start from 7.0 percent and flactulate between over the year and...
^^
Line 6, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m that, in mid of 1996s in japan jobless fall and after that increased slowly yea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, whereas, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 730.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1048951049 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.279162487 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 151.598771433 43.030603864 352% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 182.5 112.824112599 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.75 22.9334400587 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11510386616 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686920919241 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05234741623 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067676819023 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465519705945 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.2329268293 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.