The value in US dollars in millions of dollars of investment in funds of four categories from 1988 to 2014

Essay topics:

The value in US dollars (in millions of dollars) of investment in funds of four categories from 1988 to 2014

The graph illustrates the amount of money in US dollars of investment in funds of four categories namely company shares, fine art, gold and property, between 1988 and 2014.

Overview, it is apparent/ it is clear that the value of investment in funds of four categories witnessed an uptrend. By 2014, there are a widened considerably between four categories.

In 1988, gold had been recorded the largest allocation of funds, at 100 million dollars, followed by fine art with approximately 80 million dollars, while an equal amount of 50 million dollars was spent/ invested on company share and property .

Despite initial fluctuation, the figures for gold and fine art had seen upward trends throughout the given period. The increasing were particularly noticeable in the last 8 years, during which time gold investment peaked at 450 million dollars in 2012 before falling back to approximately 375 million dollars in 2014, while fund for fine art significantly rising from 100 million dollars in 2006 to nearly 350 million dollars in 2014.

Funds for two remaining categories grew a little bit until 1994. The amount of money invested for company shares then tripled in 1996 and rose sharply to 250 million dollars in 2014, while property recorded/ witnessed a substantial increase in fund from 2006 onwards, reaching approximately 150 million dollars by 2014.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-05-08 tr_h.20 80 view
2023-04-17 tieuquynh 73 view
2023-04-17 tieuquynh 73 view
2022-07-28 kevann 84 view
2022-06-29 quytnee 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
.../ invested on company share and property . Despite initial fluctuation, the fig...
^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...years, during which time gold investment peaked at 450 million dollars in 2012 be...
^^
Line 9, column 43, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...nds for two remaining categories grew a little bit until 1994. The amount of money investe...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24545454545 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78217628911 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.8309489986 43.030603864 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.25 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.53709136583 0.215688989381 249% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222093768613 0.103423049105 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136263963723 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303983754923 0.15604864568 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691363172457 0.0819641961636 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.