The graph shows the value in US dollars (in millions of dollars) of investment in funds of four categories from 1988 to 2014.
Given is the line graph depicting the amount of money spent for four separate categories: property, gold, fine art and company shares over a 26-year period, commencing from 1988.
Perceptibly, all of these figures experienced an exponential surge during the examined years. In addition, a cursory glance at the graph is enough to make sure that the value in gold investment achieved the highest figure at the end of the period while it was opposite was true for property.
Starting at approximately 80 million dollars, the investment fund for fine art showed a ceaseless fluctuation prior to recording 180 million dollars in 2004. Thereafter, this figure drastically leaped to 340 million dollars in the next 10 years. Regarding gold, it mostly attracted a multitude of investors with 100 million dollars for the first year. Additionally, it continuously went up in the ensuing years and peaked its zenith in 2012 with 450 million dollars before witnessing a downswing to 380 million in 2014.
When it comes to the funds for property and company shares, both of the figures shared almost the similar trend from 1988 to 1994, which accreted from 50 to about 80 million dollars. Remarkably, company shares received more and more attention from investors when it experienced a proliferation to 250 million dollars in 2014, meanwhile, the fund of property considerately escalated to 150 million dollars at the same year.
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people Agree or disagree 56
- With the help of technology students nowadays can learn more information and learn it more quickly Do you agree or disagree 49
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the percentages of males and females with higher education qualifications in 5 countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14718614719 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83653198154 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5144753758 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.111111111 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363574480627 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137277974398 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724015268464 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183197820204 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962276666177 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14718614719 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83653198154 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5144753758 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.111111111 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363574480627 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137277974398 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724015268464 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183197820204 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962276666177 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.