You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by select

Essay topics:

**You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.**

***The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.***

***Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.***

***Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.***

You should write **at least 150 words.**

![https://iotcdn.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/2018-08/may%202017%20w1…](https://iotcdn.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/2018-08/may%202017%20w1…)

The chart given represents a modification in global expenditure of top five famous mobile phone brands from 2009 to 2013.
In general, it is apparent that the quantity of Samsung’s sale hit the highest number in 2013 while the proportion of Apple reached the bottom of amount. It is also clear that Samsung, Apple and ZTE had similar increased tendencies in 4 years. Contrastingly, Nokia and LG had falling trends.
Looking at the bar chart, in 2009, the amount of Samsung phone stayed at approximately 230, but in 2013, it climbed to 450 which is the highest point in all of number. About Apple brand, it had noticeable difference with a beginning at 25 phones in 2009 and grew to 150 phones. Meanwhile Samsung and Apple had significant changes, ZTE just slowly escalated from 50 to nearly 60 in the time of 4 years.
In contrast, Nokia and LG had dissimilar trends which went down from 2009 to 2013. In 2009, Nokia sold out nearly 440 phones while 4 years later, it dropped dramatically to 250 phones. With the same tendency, LG started to sell about 130 mobile phones in 2009, and plunged to 80 phones in 2013.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
... phones in 2009 and grew to 150 phones. Meanwhile Samsung and Apple had significant chang...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...09, and plunged to 80 phones in 2013.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, while, in contrast, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75757575758 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61753113407 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570707070707 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9243071301 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163235334982 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702813507096 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728846992674 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122043739365 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794454796642 0.0819641961636 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.