The bar chart gives information about where British chose to emigrate to from 2004 to 2007.
It is noticeable that compared with other four countries, Australia gained much more popularity in these four years. Specifically, the number of British who emigrated to Australia declined slightly to 39 thousand in 2005 and then increased dramatically, peaking at more than 50,000, which was followed by a moderate decline.
A similar pattern of change can be observed between the emigrant to four countries, the figure for which saw a downward trend in the given period. Although the amount of immigrants leaving for Spain fell gradually from 35 thousand to approximately 28 thousand, it was almost double that of immigrants to New Zealand which also descended, bottoming out at 20 thousand in 2007. Meanwhile, the figure for the immigrants who went to USA witnessed a fluctuation, ranging from 19 thousand in 2005 and 2007 to 24 thousand in 2004 and 2006. There was a surge in the quantity of immigrants to France between 2004 and 2005, peaking at around 33,000, after which it almost halved in the following two years.
Overall, Australian was the most welcomed destination compared with other four areas. Adversely, the other four areas were less likely to be chose over the span of 4 years.
- Human activities have negative effects on plants and animals species. Some people think that is too late to do anything about this problem. Other people believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give yo 89
- The graphs below show the annual expenditure of university students in three countries in 2003. 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0141509434 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75117292699 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594339622642 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5721673998 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125996099385 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059905748549 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739141064179 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100341288137 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954477103931 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.