The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar charts illustrate what UK graduates and postgraduates did after finishing college in 2008.
Overall, graduate and postgraduate students who pursued further education registered the highest figures and those who did voluntary work accounts for the smallest propotion.
Looking at the first bar chart, it is immediately obvious that the number of graduates continued further study after leaving college hit the highest point, with approximately 29,660 students, followed by the ones who did part-time work with 17,735 students. The number of graduates who remains unemployed was roughly high with 16,235 students. In comparison, only 3,500 graduate students participate in voluntary work after college, which was a relatively small number.
It is evident from the second chart most postgraduates choose further study after college, with a number of 2,725 students. The second largest sector was the number of postgraduates taking part-time work, which registered 2,535 students. About 1,625 students suffered unemployment after leaving universities. Again, the smallest number was observed in postgraduates doing community service, with merely 345 students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-21 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 78 | view |
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 73
- Write a paragraph about the typical characteristics of Vietnamese people 56
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status 89
- There holds a debate of a large number of Vietnamese that people should stop killing cats and dogs for food since these animals are very friendly and close to people Others still remain this eating habit since these animals supply a huge amount of meat fo 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 26.3917525773 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 937.175257732 107% => OK
No of words: 169.0 206.0 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92899408284 4.54256449028 131% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89371497543 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 127.690721649 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585798816568 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 290.88556701 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3020741727 44.8134815571 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 76.5299724578 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 16.8248392259 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 4.34317383033 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274990741659 0.216113520407 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131994422467 0.0766984524023 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946653287441 0.0603063233224 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213389177977 0.12726935374 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901470714643 0.0580467560999 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 8.37731958763 190% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 70.7449484536 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 8.71597938144 196% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 41.2886597938 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 8.62886597938 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.