In natural scenic spots, such as lakes, mountains and beaches there is much litter or rubbish. Why do people do that? How to deal with it?
These days, the pollution produced by tourism has threatened the natural environment of some tourist attractions, making it a big problem to be adressed before those places are completely spoiled. This essay will delve into the causes of this phenomenon and suggest simple measures to solve it.
The most obvious reason why people people litter in natural scenic areas is that they have little awareness of environmental conservation and the repercussions of their action. Tourists usually possess the belief that one plastic bottle or one wrapper of chips wouldn’t matter. However, they don’t understand that if thousands of people do the same thing, natural scenic spots will turn into a landfill. They also don’t know that their rubbish is mostly made of non-biodegradable material which can take thousands of years to decompose, causing soil contamination and driving many animal species to the verge of extinction.
The second reason of this problem is that they think it is not their responsibility. They usually hold the misconception the onus of keeping these places clean rests on governments and local authorities. Hence, they consider protecting the environment none of their businesss and continue leaving a trail of pollution in their wake. Moreover, the environmental protection facilties are not sufficient in some tourist attractions. People would not litter in natural scenic areas if trashcans are at regular intervals.
The first step towards sustainable tourism is that governments, local authorities and tourist companies should educate the tourists about their responsibilities. More campaigns should be launched to enhance tourists’ awareness of environmental issues. Tour operators also have the responsibilities to make tourists realise that their careless attitude to the environment could skill future tourism and that nothing would be left for the next generations. Additionally, the authorities should ensure proper facilties at such tourist attractions and enforce laws to fine heavily anyone who litters carelessly.
To conclude, irresponsible tourism can have a lot of detrimental impacts on the natural environment, so both governments and individuals should take reponsiblities towards this issue. Everyone should remember the saying “A good tourist is one who leaves behind nothing but footprints and takes away nothing but photographs”.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-11 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 94 | view |
- Some people think that sending criminals to prison is not effective Education and job training should be used instead Do you agree or disagree 67
- It is said that people who read books for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than people who watch TV Do you agree or disagree 84
- Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught To what extent do you agree disagree 73
- Write a paragraph about the typical characteristics of Vietnamese people 56
- The table shows information about department stores and online stores in Australia in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 29, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: people
... solve it. The most obvious reason why people people litter in natural scenic areas is that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 624, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mal species to the verge of extinction. The second reason of this problem is tha...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6974789916 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15651351778 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579831932773 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2169228676 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.647058824 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41176470588 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123211409781 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412229179093 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070476115944 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0626074841668 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657494341035 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.