The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from five countries in 1962, 1982 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The plot shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from UK, India, New Zealand, Vietnam and India in 1962, 1982 and 2002.
At the first look, the highest proportion of people who immigrated to Australia in the first and last year is Italy, which was 40% and 15%, this number in 1982 was 25% and it was owned by Vietnam.
The percentage of immigrants from Italy was significantly drop from the maximum value, compare to others proportions, 40% in 1962 to 20% in 1982 and continued declined to 15% in 2002, but still had the largest percentage in 2002. The percentage from New Zealand also decreased from 8% to 5% for the first and the last year and they held the lowest percentage for 2 decades-after.
The percentage from other 3 countries were not stable. However, they had the same trend which grew up for first 20 years and fell for next 20 years. From Vietnam, that rate grew from 10% to 25% - biggest percentage in 1982 and went down 15% in 2002. From UK was from 10% to 17% and fell to 12% for 3 years. And the last country, India, Its came from 2% the lowest portion to 15% and slightly decreased to 14.5% in 2002.
Overall, the percentage of immigrants to Australia from Italia and New Zealand was decrease for 40 years. In contrast, this number from UK, Vietnam and India was increased although those were not stable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-22 | Hoang Minh | 87 | view |
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the process of making matches Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 39
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development? 73
- In many countries people are spending more hours at their workplace Why is that Is that negative and positive development 80
- In the future people may have to live on other planets Some think that is therefore important to spend money researching other planets such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree 63
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives So then it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'dropped'.
Suggestion: dropped
...immigrants from Italy was significantly drop from the maximum value, compare to othe...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...lowest percentage for 2 decades-after. The percentage from other 3 countries were ...
^^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '- the biggest'.
Suggestion: - the biggest
...Vietnam, that rate grew from 10% to 25% - biggest percentage in 1982 and went down 15% in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, still, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 5.05154639175 317% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 26.3917525773 171% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 937.175257732 117% => OK
No of words: 241.0 206.0 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55186721992 4.54256449028 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.78020617076 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48007220559 2.54303337028 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 127.690721649 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473029045643 0.622605031667 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 290.88556701 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.41237113402 85% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.2973828534 44.8134815571 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7272727273 76.5299724578 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 16.8248392259 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 4.34317383033 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225306234101 0.216113520407 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113644692364 0.0766984524023 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762353807079 0.0603063233224 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157310589637 0.12726935374 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718573330296 0.0580467560999 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 8.37731958763 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 70.7449484536 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 7.45979381443 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 8.71597938144 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 7.59969072165 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 41.2886597938 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 8.62886597938 203% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.