The map and chart below show the information for the global willingness to eat insect products

Essay topics:

The map and chart below show the information for the global willingness to eat insect products.

The given figure illustrates the number of people are willing to consume insects products among thirteen nations across the globe.

Overall, less than half total given nations around the world have the data of people' willingness to eat products stemming from insect. Moreover, Mexico hosts the first rank of consuming insect based products whereas the reverse pattern is occurred in Japan.

According to the supplied picture, it is obvious that Mexico, Peru, Thailand, Brazil, China are the nations have major people who are willing to use insect products. It is undoubtedly that major of the Mexican consume most insect based products across the globe, with the given statistic is 71%. Subsequently, Thailand and Peru account for more than half people' willingness to eat insect and higher than 10% when compared with China and Brazil. Furthermore, the number of people are willing to eat insect product in China and Brazil nearly met at the same record, which is 44 and 45 percentage respectively.

Turning to the remaining group, it is clear that Australia, USA, Russia, India, Spain and UK nearly have the similar pattern, which is the total people' willingness to eat insect is more than 30%. Finally, the Japanese come as the least nation of consuming insect products, which is merely 20%.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-05-10 bingewatch57 view
2022-05-10 bingewatch57 view
2022-03-13 quytnee 78 view
Essays by user quytnee :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (China) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...t Mexico, Peru, Thailand, Brazil, China are the nations have major people who are w...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, moreover, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.48453608247 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 26.3917525773 91% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 937.175257732 116% => OK
No of words: 212.0 206.0 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14622641509 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46608808108 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 127.690721649 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 290.88556701 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.0271925254 44.8134815571 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.222222222 76.5299724578 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 16.8248392259 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 4.34317383033 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210599079919 0.216113520407 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993734373619 0.0766984524023 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402477503854 0.0603063233224 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137705890913 0.12726935374 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389316935889 0.0580467560999 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 8.37731958763 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 70.7449484536 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 8.71597938144 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 7.59969072165 120% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 41.2886597938 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.