Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems Others believe that celebrities can make the problem seem less important

Essay topics:

Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems. Others believe that celebrities can make the problem seem less important.

The International aid organizations always tend to serve numerous people with the support of many groups who/which are willing to help those in need. One school of thought opines that celebrities can possibly promote public awareness like poverty, illiteracy and many, while others think that the focus on the issue might be shifted on them. I believe that the foremost view is more rational and will discuss more in detail in the forthcoming paragraphs.

Firstly, when star kinds of people support or take part in the event, then the followers who worship them as their superstar will also start participating in the charity events. The celebrities set an example for their fan base in these kinds of activities. To put it down clearly, they have been an inspiration for many people around the world. Suriya, for example, a well known tamil actor is supporting a large number of students for their education. As a result, so many individuals have started to donate to the organization to help students, who cannot afford their tuition fee.

Secondly, famous people can influence individuals all over the world and their views will reach everyone rapidly. Furthermore, as they are media people they have more power to draw attention even to non sensational issues which in turn brings much more value to the humans in need. James Eric, for instance, a popular singer who took to Instagram to make his fans aware of the worsening covid situation in India and asked them to offer help. This action of his is extending covid-related help across the country.

To conclude, celebs tend to be a part of social activities. This essay discussed why renowned people's involvement is an added advantage rather than making the issue worsen. In my opinion, engaging celebrities in non-profitable groups can create global awareness, so they would continue spreading information and inspire many of them.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-08 barkavi 78 view
Essays by user barkavi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...hool of thought opines that celebrities can possibly promote public awareness like poverty, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 407, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... a well known tamil actor is supporting a large number of students for their education. As a resu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 2, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vid-related help across the country. To conclude, celebs tend to be a part of...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 4.92783505155 223% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.03092783505 330% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 32.9175257732 76% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 26.3917525773 159% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 937.175257732 170% => OK
No of words: 312.0 206.0 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11217948718 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 3.78020617076 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73760542834 2.54303337028 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 127.690721649 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634615384615 0.622605031667 102% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 290.88556701 170% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.83505154639 218% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.6252444787 44.8134815571 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 76.5299724578 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 16.8248392259 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 4.34317383033 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 7.41237113402 148% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195953419105 0.216113520407 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582444546424 0.0766984524023 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423310738246 0.0603063233224 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119599796115 0.12726935374 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437369543273 0.0580467560999 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 8.37731958763 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 70.7449484536 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 8.71597938144 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 7.59969072165 123% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 41.2886597938 225% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.