I am writing this letter on behalf of 'Spring Lake Society' to express our deep distress caused because of faulty garbage collection system. As a result, many of our families are suffering with various problems and few are addressed in here.
Normally, rubbish collection vehicle regularly visits our locality every morning 7 AM. However, from past two weeks, for some reason no one is coming to collect wastage materials from our bins. Further, garbage collectors are irregular and few times forget to clear some bins completely. On the other hand, they are dumping garbage into near by lake which is even more serious as it can contaminate our drinking water. Taking advantage of this situation, stray dogs are rampaging all over the garbage cans and spreading disposed covers through out the result. Consequently, when wind blows, these dirty and harmful items are entering into our houses making the conditions even worse.
At this vulnerable juncture, our community is even more worried about growing health menace because of flies and mosquitoes coming from garbage's. In addition, air and environment is polluted because of obnoxious smell arising out of decomposed rubbish. Adding to the existing problem, rats are increasing day by day as they are taking shelter in those stinky places. If sufficient action is not taken, we are afraid that, our vicinity might become a breeding space for diseases like malaria and typhoid.
Before it's too lake, kindly wake up and arrange for trucks to clean our surroundings. In my opinion, a time table has to be deployed for proper garbage management. Accordingly, please instruct your cleaning stuff to avoid irregular gaps between days and to follow uniform method to evade future complications. Significant changes has to be done in waste disposal manner. If necessary, council can increase housing taxes to implement scientific techniques. Another way to deal with problem is to ask residents for using different boxes to dispose wet and dry waste. In this way, not only garbage heaps can be reduced but also recycling is possible.
Hope my intervention did not disturb your plans and look forward for your response.
Yours Sincerely,
James.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing this letter on behalf of Spring Lake Society to express our deep distress ca...
^^
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...letter on behalf of Spring Lake Society to express our deep distress caused beca...
^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...astage materials from our bins. Further, garbage collectors are irregular and few...
^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...her hand, they are dumping garbage into near by lake which is even more serious as it c...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...bage cans and spreading disposed covers through out the result. Consequently, when wind blo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, however, if, look, so, as to, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.48453608247 254% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 5.05154639175 238% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 32.9175257732 85% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 26.3917525773 182% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 937.175257732 198% => OK
No of words: 355.0 206.0 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23661971831 4.54256449028 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 3.78020617076 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64190814284 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 127.690721649 193% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692957746479 0.622605031667 111% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 290.88556701 200% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.83505154639 272% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 12.6804123711 166% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.066819011 44.8134815571 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5238095238 76.5299724578 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9047619048 16.8248392259 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 4.34317383033 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 2.54639175258 196% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.49484536082 602% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257394106828 0.216113520407 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637708614683 0.0766984524023 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594248151008 0.0603063233224 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130937389775 0.12726935374 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454816471501 0.0580467560999 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 8.37731958763 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 70.7449484536 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 8.71597938144 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 7.59969072165 126% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 41.2886597938 279% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.