Too much traffic in britain as compared to 1980s
Public transport should be introduced and laws on ownership of private cars should be created.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
A significant increase in the number of vehicles has been noticed in the past decade. Cars are no more a luxury and have rather become a basic need. This rapid increase in the number in the number of cars has badly influenced the environment we live in. Vehicles not only harm the nature but pose adverse effects on our health as well. Now, its high time that public transport should be encouraged and strict laws regarding ownership of cars should be introduced.
With a rise in the number of vehicles the health of our planet has declined significantly. Vehicular emissions are the main cause of air pollution not only in India but all over the world. The government should encourage cleaner fuels like CNG which cause less harm to the nature and are eco-friendly as well. Moreover, governments should also monitor the ration of cars on road. For instance, the government of Singapore issues vehicles on lottery basis, keeping the traffic proportionate to the ecological status of the nature. The public transport is so efficient that people choose travelling through it only. Such initiatives help the government to control both traffic and environment related hazards.
Vehicles not only are hazardous for the nature but, pose a great threat to human health as well. Nowadays people use their cars to go to short distances, which makes them physically unactive. Many young children take up cars, which is both illegal and makes them unfit too. Moreover, the habit of walking and cycling among youngsters has also seen a significant decline. According to the survey conducted by Indian Institute of Technology(Delhi) the introduction of power driven scooty has led to 30% decline in the sales of cycles. This proves that cycling is being curbed by vehicles.
Hence, the status symbol attached with possession of vehicles should be removed and government should encourage the use of public transport among the people. This will help in restoring the ecological balance and make people more fit as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | HARSHITA JAITLY | 78 | view |
- Wealth does not necessarily guaranty happiness To what extent do you agree with this statement Provide reasons for your answer Include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 27
- Too much traffic in britain as compared to 1980sPublic transport should be introduced and laws on ownership of private cars should be created.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 78
- Wealth does not necessarily guaranty happiness.To what extent do you agree with this statement?Provide reasons for your answer. Include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.Write at least 250 words. 11
- Nowadays people chose to be self employed rather than working for a company.What might be the case?What are some of the disadvantages of being self employed. 73
- In many countries young children are looked after during the day while their parents go to work In a sense they are raised by guardians and not their biological parents What is your opinion of this family arrangement 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uced. With a rise in the number of vehicles the health of our planet has de...
^^
Line 5, column 588, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to travel'.
Suggestion: to travel
...port is so efficient that people choose travelling through it only. Such initiatives help ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 32.9175257732 43% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 26.3917525773 178% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 937.175257732 180% => OK
No of words: 332.0 206.0 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08734939759 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 3.78020617076 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6907960197 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 127.690721649 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545180722892 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 524.7 290.88556701 180% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6804123711 158% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7845010379 44.8134815571 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.45 76.5299724578 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 16.8248392259 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 4.34317383033 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 7.41237113402 148% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176659857663 0.216113520407 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482358129646 0.0766984524023 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788821525964 0.0603063233224 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113907865604 0.12726935374 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525201244923 0.0580467560999 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 8.37731958763 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 70.7449484536 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 8.71597938144 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 7.59969072165 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 41.2886597938 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.