traveling
The table manifests English public traveling in different modes has changed from 1985 to 2000, inclusive of walking, bicycle, car, local bus, long distance bus, train, taxi, and other.
According to the table, the total amount of average distance in miles travelled per person per year shows a significantly accretion, by 1735 miles. Cars were the most popular transportation in England in both 1985 and 2000. Taxi had the least miles between any other travel modes in 1985, accounted for 13 miles, although the amount of taxi's miles increased in 2000, taxi were still classified as an unpopular transportation, constituted 42 miles.
The changes of different travel modes between 1985 and 2000 can divided into two parts, increasing and decreasing. Car, long distance bus, train, taxi, and other transportation got accretions from 1985 to 2000, however, train and taxi increased slightly, by no more than 100 miles. Walking, bicycle, and local bus decreased during 1985 to 2000.
Overall, car were always the main travel mode in England. In contrast, bicycle and taxi were the least popular transportation for English public.
- Crime rates are increasing at an alarming level What are the causes of this problem 79
- More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes car and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 57
- Overpopulation. Problems and Solutions 11
- Nowadays people get married and have children after the age of 30 Is it a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('accretion') instead of another adjective.
...les travelled per person per year shows a significantly accretion, by 1735 miles. Cars were the most popu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.03092783505 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 32.9175257732 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 26.3917525773 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 937.175257732 102% => OK
No of words: 180.0 206.0 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 4.54256449028 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72564410782 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 127.690721649 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.622605031667 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 290.88556701 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.6745392526 44.8134815571 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 76.5299724578 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 16.8248392259 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 4.34317383033 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182580648522 0.216113520407 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972915398325 0.0766984524023 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946113743604 0.0603063233224 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13716418775 0.12726935374 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287327772345 0.0580467560999 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 8.37731958763 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 70.7449484536 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 8.71597938144 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 41.2886597938 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.