You have just read an article in an international travel magazine which contain some information about your town that is incorrect.
Write a letter to the editor of the magazine. In the letter
- Correct the information in the article
- Explain why it is important for the magazine to give correct information
- Suggest what the magazine should do about this situation
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am writing this letter in the hope that this will bring your attention to the inaccurate information in the last week's issue of your magazine about my hometown, Ho Chi Minh City.
In the article about the history and development of Ho Chi Minh City, the writer stated that the old name of Ho Chi Minh city was Cho Lon, which was incorrect. The correct name was Saigon, Cho Lon was just the name of a small part of Saigon, which was formed in the seventeenth century.
I believe this information is very important for the readers to understand the true historic development of this beautiful city. Your error could cause confusion for people who are trying to learn about the development of Ho Chi Minh city as well as it could leave uncomfortable feelings for the locals like myself. Also, history should always be respected.
I suggest that the magazine should rectify this information in the next issue and it should be in a place that could draw attention to your readers, for example on the home page. Moreover, for the prevention of the same happened in future, please double-check all your information, especially those related to history, places or people, before posting it in the magazine.
I trust that this will be rectified quickly and I look forward to reading your next publication.
Yours faithfully,
Kevin
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...for the prevention of the same happened in future, please double-check all your informati...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, so, well, as for, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 32.9175257732 88% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 26.3917525773 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.85567010309 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 937.175257732 120% => OK
No of words: 233.0 206.0 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81115879828 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6534853234 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 127.690721649 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549356223176 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 290.88556701 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3868672351 44.8134815571 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.1 76.5299724578 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 16.8248392259 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 4.34317383033 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161335123561 0.216113520407 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591434002769 0.0766984524023 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464986551386 0.0603063233224 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872541232804 0.12726935374 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510566052313 0.0580467560999 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 8.37731958763 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 70.7449484536 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 8.71597938144 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 41.2886597938 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.