The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people. But some people say that young people can also be a leader. Do you agree or disagree?
An organization’s most important position is its leaders. These positions are usually reserved for the most competent and brilliant people, normally with many years of experience. But today, a certain number of people and organizations believe that even at a young age, young leaders are capable of driving their company forward. And I am in agreement with this sentiment.
First, these young leaders could bring new fresh ideas that the elder are not able to do. For example, Satya Nadella, Microsoft’s CEO, one of the biggest conglomerates in the world, brought fresh ideas about cloud computing that helped Microsoft grow tenfold to become the second biggest company in the world in terms of value. And he is only in his 40’s.
Besides, some old directors are too afraid to make changes while the young are not. Young people are more adventurous and dare to make changes, the changes so big that sometimes it redefines a company’s culture. Again, with Satya Nadella, Microsoft has changed its mindset to be more friendly toward Apple, and that has helped Microsoft to open a lot of business opportunities, a result that the previous CEO couldn’t make during his tenure.
But there are always two sides to any problem. While brilliant young leaders can do wonders, but due to their inexperience, they sometimes make mistake. Organizations cannot underestimate old leaders with their vast experience since it will help a lot in the decision making. A combination of both will be what organizations should head to.
In the end, it is up to the organization to decide its fate. There is no doubt that young leaders bring new ideas, but the experience cannot be overlooked. It is not the age, it is the proficiency that matters.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, look, second, so, while, for example, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01034482759 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84594753295 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.9710503136 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4705882353 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235997490701 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653881305716 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672696993189 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119499589919 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355653148838 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.