Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The healthier nation, the wealthier country. Public health is one of the most important sectors of any governments since healthy people can work longer contributing to a prosperity of a country. The government, therefore, should make efforts to continuously improve public health. The question is whether building sports centres improves public health significantly or not. In my opinion, constructing sports facilities is the best way to keep public healthy.
Nowadays, surprisingly, the most pervasive disease in the world is obesity, which triggers other lethal illnesses such as cardiovascular diseases. It is believed that people are suffering from obesity due to lack of sport. Moreover, most of obese people lead a sedentary lifestyle. Thus it would be a good solution to build sports facilities at offices where employees many of whom have insufficient time to visit fitness centres could do exercises at break times. In addition, some people most of whom are suffering from obesity can not visit sports centres due to the fact that they are either crowded or too costly. The government, consequently, should give an order to construct as many sports facilities as its budget allows to do so.
On the other hand, in order to achieve improvements in public health building only sports facilities might not be sufficient as there are some factors which contribute to improving it: sufficient hospitals and nutrition advice centres.
In conclusion, public health might be considered as the main wealth of any country since healthy people have a long longevity. Thus building sports centres is one of the best means to improve public health; nevertheless, other facilities which contribute to public health should not be neglected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Amila Priynatha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Leeinho | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | MHT | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Gholamirayaneh | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | junjunh | 78 | view |
- The graphs below show the number of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of Freedonia. 78
- Companies should encourage employees who work in a high position to leave at the age of 55 in order to give opportunities to the new generation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories. (Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home, housework and gardening.) 61
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both views and give your op 70
- What discovery in the last 100 years has been most beneficial for people in your country? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...bese people lead a sedentary lifestyle. Thus it would be a good solution to build sp...
^^^^
Line 3, column 731, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
... sports facilities as its budget allows to do so. On the other hand, in order to a...
^^^^^
where employees many of whom have insufficient time
where many of employees have insufficient time
some people most of whom are suffering from obesity can not visit sports centres
some people who are suffering from obesity can not visit sports centres
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'in my opinion', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25 0.247107548796 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.164473684211 0.15552993741 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.121710526316 0.0946569551029 129% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0559210526316 0.0501201869031 112% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0197368421053 0.0437536398559 45% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0986842105263 0.122223957237 81% => OK
Participles: 0.0361842105263 0.0403219363162 90% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.93238352571 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0427631578947 0.0326786765898 131% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0789473684211 0.0861751148067 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0296052631579 0.0214082191602 138% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0197368421053 0.0119246538136 166% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1742.0 1933.38276553 90% => OK
No of words: 274.0 316.052104208 87% => OK
Chars per words: 6.33454545455 6.10592293882 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20519365927 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.445255474453 0.37474360046 119% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.310218978102 0.284197041944 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.222627737226 0.203843217982 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.171532846715 0.137313986986 125% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93238352571 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543795620438 0.560935902166 97% => OK
Word variations: 54.4789103208 60.7401812628 90% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0911823647 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.2666666667 20.7725350517 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.492723445 49.5273876611 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4152249135 93.4120437189 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2214532872 15.2821509519 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.674740484429 0.594174754866 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.39078156313 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01102204409 80% => OK
Readability: 49.2885644769 49.1922392462 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.60273972603 1.69127372897 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Topic essay coherence: 0.382213707462 0.332604825255 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0982738851943 0.102734651613 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0502413435795 0.0668474354756 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.522175042521 0.534917948617 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.160423909511 0.148666948902 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148738836277 0.13441755203 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628846611439 0.0742828286743 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.309604490173 0.324241079732 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0325320776755 0.0640056729886 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258586110734 0.22793763319 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485845962111 0.0582452615562 83% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41883767535 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.88977955912 136% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.60220440882 77% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.00200400802 100% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.493987976 114% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 71.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 6.5 Out of 9