1 As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom

Essay topics:

1.As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom.

Technology had immense advances in most fields, including education. Nowadays many people are debating whether computers will replace teachers' positions in the future. However I believe that human interaction is the best form of education. I will explain my argument in more detail below.
Computers are great tools for searching for information. It's much faster than lining up and waiting to question a teacher. Furthermore, students have different intellectual capacities, so studying with a computer can help those who pick up knowledge quicker become more knowledgeable and do not have to wait for other students. On the other hand, it also helps slower students acquire knowledge more comfortable. Working with computers wouldn't make them feel shy or inferior that they are less smarter than others.
However, there will be many problems if students use only computers for studying all the time, especially with primary school students who are too young to control their behaviors. They need to be guided, supervised, and limited in the amount of information and knowledge they read and study each day. Furthermore, teachers can detect the deficiencies or psychological changes of students to find the reasons, and provide the methods to help them overcome them timely. Moreover, students need to learn many skills, one of which is social skills. Obviously, a computer cannot teach people how to interact with one another better than a real person can.
Although technology is continuously improving and supporting people to solve many problems in life, machines don't have feelings or affectation, so they cannot replace humans in their roles, a computer can't be a model for students to look at.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-06-28 ragavlib 61 view
Essays by user Lyly241096 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Technology had immense advances in most ...
^^
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...place teachers positions in the future. However I believe that human interaction is the...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 436, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ore comfortable. Working with computers wouldnt make them feel shy or inferior that the...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 489, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less smart'?
Suggestion: less smart
...them feel shy or inferior that they are less smarter than others. However, there will be ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o solve many problems in life, machines dont have feelings or affectation, so they c...
^^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...place humans in their roles, a computer cant be a model for students to look at.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31111111111 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8162666821 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625925925926 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6935622448 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227971820811 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709247968895 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558803212596 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130024402884 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200454399547 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Technology had immense advances in most ...
^^
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...place teachers positions in the future. However I believe that human interaction is the...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 436, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ore comfortable. Working with computers wouldnt make them feel shy or inferior that the...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 489, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less smart'?
Suggestion: less smart
...them feel shy or inferior that they are less smarter than others. However, there will be ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o solve many problems in life, machines dont have feelings or affectation, so they c...
^^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...place humans in their roles, a computer cant be a model for students to look at.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31111111111 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8162666821 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625925925926 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6935622448 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227971820811 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709247968895 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558803212596 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130024402884 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200454399547 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.