(3.12.2016): International travel has many advantages to both travellers and the country that they visited. Do Advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In contemporary society, international tourism has brought many benefits to both travelers and the host nations which receive them. While some clear drawbacks of this development, I think its values are more significant.
On the one hand, several reasons explain the negative influence of traveling internationally. Firstly, situations of exploitation of tourists in famous destinations are becoming popular. For instance, in Dubai, foreign visitors have to pay for everything from traveling to accommodation with grossly inflated prices and they can meet a lot of complicated situations such as conflicts of languages. In addition, the environment is heavily influenced by the development of international tourism. This is because the growth in the number of tourists from abroad would encourage overusing of fossil fuels for industry and transport. Thus the greenhouse effect and heavy climate changes are big fear. Also, the amount of food loss and waste has increased significantly, as a result of wasting natural resources.
On the other hand, I suppose the benefits of international travel would eclipse those analyzed disadvantages. The first reason relates to the growth potential of the economy so those nations have greater competition with other countries. For example, with cheaper tour packages, they have more opportunities to attract tourists from abroad. Travelers can have several fascinating experiences of exotic cuisine and culture, and the traditional craft villages can get out of bankruptcy. Moreover, boosting traveling abroad reduces the conflict between cultures and languages of different countries.
In conclusion, even if travel overseas causes some risk of producing pollution and transmitting illnesses, I believe that the downsides are outweighed by the upsides, which include offering job chances, making fortune, improving local facilities for the local people, and expanding travelers’ horizons.
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 100
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports is bteer like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia and the table shows where people born in these countries live 73
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 629, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ossil fuels for industry and transport. Thus the greenhouse effect and heavy climate...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, i suppose, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81690140845 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15790698289 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644366197183 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9639262068 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.133333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1333333333 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174643188544 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521483383461 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542236141963 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10721986231 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203223675995 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 629, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ossil fuels for industry and transport. Thus the greenhouse effect and heavy climate...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, i suppose, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81690140845 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15790698289 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644366197183 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9639262068 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.133333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1333333333 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174643188544 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521483383461 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542236141963 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10721986231 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203223675995 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.